<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Adwords: improving your ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/01/21/google-adwords-improving-your-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/01/21/google-adwords-improving-your-ads/</link>
	<description>Successful software requires more than just good programming.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 08:40:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 great ways to waste money in Google Adwords &#171; Successful Software</title>
		<link>http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/01/21/google-adwords-improving-your-ads/#comment-13794</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[5 great ways to waste money in Google Adwords &#171; Successful Software]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/01/21/google-adwords-improving-your-ads/#comment-13794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] get any impressions at $0.10 per click I would try to either improve my quality score (e.g. improve my ads or delete keywords with low clickthrough rates) or find cheaper &#8216;long tail&#8217; keywords to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] get any impressions at $0.10 per click I would try to either improve my quality score (e.g. improve my ads or delete keywords with low clickthrough rates) or find cheaper &#8216;long tail&#8217; keywords to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Hebb</title>
		<link>http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/01/21/google-adwords-improving-your-ads/#comment-8082</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Hebb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/01/21/google-adwords-improving-your-ads/#comment-8082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To add to Andy&#039;s, I&#039;ve run ad variations where the Optimize option barely rotated them at all, so getting enough data to compare the variations was impossible unless Rotate was selected.

BTW, the UK / USA comparison was interesting. I have adgroups with similar behaviors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To add to Andy&#8217;s, I&#8217;ve run ad variations where the Optimize option barely rotated them at all, so getting enough data to compare the variations was impossible unless Rotate was selected.</p>
<p>BTW, the UK / USA comparison was interesting. I have adgroups with similar behaviors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Brice</title>
		<link>http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/01/21/google-adwords-improving-your-ads/#comment-8026</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Brice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/01/21/google-adwords-improving-your-ads/#comment-8026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;Is it really that black and white?

Given a choice between displaying a high CTR/low conversion ad (which makes the best profit for Google) and a low CTR/high conversion ad (which makes the best profit for you), I would guess that Google will choose the former. Why wouldn&#039;t they? 

Feel free to run a test and tell me if I am wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Is it really that black and white?</p>
<p>Given a choice between displaying a high CTR/low conversion ad (which makes the best profit for Google) and a low CTR/high conversion ad (which makes the best profit for you), I would guess that Google will choose the former. Why wouldn&#8217;t they? </p>
<p>Feel free to run a test and tell me if I am wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnus</title>
		<link>http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/01/21/google-adwords-improving-your-ads/#comment-8025</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Magnus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/01/21/google-adwords-improving-your-ads/#comment-8025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andy, thanks for a great post.

I agree with you on all aspects. But this paragraph got stuck:

&quot;To ensure that all your ads get shown evenly select ‘Rotate: Show ads more evenly’ in your Adwords campaign settings. If you leave it at the default ‘ Optimize: Show better-performing ads more often’ Google will choose which ads show most often. Given a choice between showing the ads that make you most money and the ads which make Google most money, which do you think Google will choose?&quot;

Is it really that black and white?
I mean, in the end, both Google and I want people to click my ads.
So isn&#039;t a better performing ad good for both parties?

/Magnus]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy, thanks for a great post.</p>
<p>I agree with you on all aspects. But this paragraph got stuck:</p>
<p>&#8220;To ensure that all your ads get shown evenly select ‘Rotate: Show ads more evenly’ in your Adwords campaign settings. If you leave it at the default ‘ Optimize: Show better-performing ads more often’ Google will choose which ads show most often. Given a choice between showing the ads that make you most money and the ads which make Google most money, which do you think Google will choose?&#8221;</p>
<p>Is it really that black and white?<br />
I mean, in the end, both Google and I want people to click my ads.<br />
So isn&#8217;t a better performing ad good for both parties?</p>
<p>/Magnus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

