<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The great digital certificate ripoff?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/02/27/the-great-digital-certificate-ripoff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/02/27/the-great-digital-certificate-ripoff/</link>
	<description>Successful software requires more than just good programming.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 08:40:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anymouse</title>
		<link>http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/02/27/the-great-digital-certificate-ripoff/#comment-15678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anymouse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://successfulsoftware.wordpress.com/?p=296#comment-15678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As if Wikipedia is an authoritative source on the English language, or on any topic, for that matter.

In this case, Wikipedia is contributing to the continued dumbing down of the English language to accommodate current improper usages and slang.

Can&#039;t complain too much about Wikipedia, though, because most of the American Dictionaries are regrettably doing the same stupid thing.

Words have meaning, and precise language conveys precise thoughts and meaning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if Wikipedia is an authoritative source on the English language, or on any topic, for that matter.</p>
<p>In this case, Wikipedia is contributing to the continued dumbing down of the English language to accommodate current improper usages and slang.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t complain too much about Wikipedia, though, because most of the American Dictionaries are regrettably doing the same stupid thing.</p>
<p>Words have meaning, and precise language conveys precise thoughts and meaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jono</title>
		<link>http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/02/27/the-great-digital-certificate-ripoff/#comment-14654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jono]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://successfulsoftware.wordpress.com/?p=296#comment-14654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lindersoft offers 3 years for $200.

http://www.lindersoft.com/order_codesigning.htm 

That is a good price. Ordered yesterday and received the certificate this morning.

Jone]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lindersoft offers 3 years for $200.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lindersoft.com/order_codesigning.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.lindersoft.com/order_codesigning.htm</a> </p>
<p>That is a good price. Ordered yesterday and received the certificate this morning.</p>
<p>Jone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: softwarecandy</title>
		<link>http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/02/27/the-great-digital-certificate-ripoff/#comment-14076</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[softwarecandy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 19:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://successfulsoftware.wordpress.com/?p=296#comment-14076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just came across another blog post about this subject (code signing certificates, inexpensive alternatives):

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/155241/cheapest-java-code-signing-certificate-not-self-signed

Through that article I learned about another inexpensive (possibly the cheapest) code-signing certificate -- $50 only:

https://www.startssl.com/?app=40

Any experience with this company (StartCom)? Reviews?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came across another blog post about this subject (code signing certificates, inexpensive alternatives):</p>
<p><a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/155241/cheapest-java-code-signing-certificate-not-self-signed" rel="nofollow">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/155241/cheapest-java-code-signing-certificate-not-self-signed</a></p>
<p>Through that article I learned about another inexpensive (possibly the cheapest) code-signing certificate &#8212; $50 only:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.startssl.com/?app=40" rel="nofollow">https://www.startssl.com/?app=40</a></p>
<p>Any experience with this company (StartCom)? Reviews?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchell Vincent</title>
		<link>http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/02/27/the-great-digital-certificate-ripoff/#comment-13968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitchell Vincent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://successfulsoftware.wordpress.com/?p=296#comment-13968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure if Tucows is still offering the certificates but I have a $99 buy price on Comodo certs ($75 for ASP members) at http://codesigning.ksoftware.net - no membership fees or any extra accounts required, you submit your order directly to Comodo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if Tucows is still offering the certificates but I have a $99 buy price on Comodo certs ($75 for ASP members) at <a href="http://codesigning.ksoftware.net" rel="nofollow">http://codesigning.ksoftware.net</a> &#8211; no membership fees or any extra accounts required, you submit your order directly to Comodo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tucows/Comodo Code Signing Certificates &#171; Worktime Talk</title>
		<link>http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/02/27/the-great-digital-certificate-ripoff/#comment-13890</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tucows/Comodo Code Signing Certificates &#171; Worktime Talk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://successfulsoftware.wordpress.com/?p=296#comment-13890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] certificates are and why they are needed.    I won&#8217;t cover that here, as there are some good articles which discuss these questions.  What I want to discuss here, is our own experience of purchasing a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] certificates are and why they are needed.    I won&#8217;t cover that here, as there are some good articles which discuss these questions.  What I want to discuss here, is our own experience of purchasing a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cursive Writing - Carol</title>
		<link>http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/02/27/the-great-digital-certificate-ripoff/#comment-13787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cursive Writing - Carol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://successfulsoftware.wordpress.com/?p=296#comment-13787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, not ideal is it? I answered &quot;Yes&quot; to the security warning - &quot;Do you want to view only the webpage content that was delivered securely?&quot; Is this the same as the unencrypted information? Clicking yes disabled the &quot;Sponsor&quot; advert at the top of the page, which seems to be the only issue (I hope!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, not ideal is it? I answered &#8220;Yes&#8221; to the security warning &#8211; &#8220;Do you want to view only the webpage content that was delivered securely?&#8221; Is this the same as the unencrypted information? Clicking yes disabled the &#8220;Sponsor&#8221; advert at the top of the page, which seems to be the only issue (I hope!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: softwarecandy</title>
		<link>http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/02/27/the-great-digital-certificate-ripoff/#comment-13786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[softwarecandy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://successfulsoftware.wordpress.com/?p=296#comment-13786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carol, we just received a notification of your posting.

Cost-wise, Tucows offers the best deal -- no doubt about that. We would love to purchase our next certificate from them.

As of now, however, that checkout link (https://author.tucows.com/checkout.php) still triggers the &quot;unencrypted information&quot; warning on the browser.

We hope that they will fix this problem within the next 7 months. Their pricing is very attractive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carol, we just received a notification of your posting.</p>
<p>Cost-wise, Tucows offers the best deal &#8212; no doubt about that. We would love to purchase our next certificate from them.</p>
<p>As of now, however, that checkout link (<a href="https://author.tucows.com/checkout.php" rel="nofollow">https://author.tucows.com/checkout.php</a>) still triggers the &#8220;unencrypted information&#8221; warning on the browser.</p>
<p>We hope that they will fix this problem within the next 7 months. Their pricing is very attractive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cursive Writing - Carol</title>
		<link>http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/02/27/the-great-digital-certificate-ripoff/#comment-13785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cursive Writing - Carol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://successfulsoftware.wordpress.com/?p=296#comment-13785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks you so much for this post - very helpful! I was only aware of Verisign and that&#039;s out of my league. I noticed that Comodo offer their digital certificate to UK customers like me for GBP119 - that&#039;s equivalent to $185 - how fair is that?

I&#039;ve ordered a 1yr certificate from Tucows so I&#039;ll see how that goes. 

Thanks again for your help.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks you so much for this post &#8211; very helpful! I was only aware of Verisign and that&#8217;s out of my league. I noticed that Comodo offer their digital certificate to UK customers like me for GBP119 &#8211; that&#8217;s equivalent to $185 &#8211; how fair is that?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve ordered a 1yr certificate from Tucows so I&#8217;ll see how that goes. </p>
<p>Thanks again for your help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: softwarecandy</title>
		<link>http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/02/27/the-great-digital-certificate-ripoff/#comment-13365</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[softwarecandy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://successfulsoftware.wordpress.com/?p=296#comment-13365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t it scary that a company that sells digital certificates has a checkout process with compromised security?

Case in question: tucows code signing certificates, in the page meant for entering your credit card number and other billing information:

https://author.tucows.com/checkout.php

They said they will fix the problem &quot;in the next few weeks&quot;. It&#039;s too late for us, however, so we will have to go with other, more expensive, alternatives.

Security should not be taken lightly. After all, this is the main reason for code-signing our software.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it scary that a company that sells digital certificates has a checkout process with compromised security?</p>
<p>Case in question: tucows code signing certificates, in the page meant for entering your credit card number and other billing information:</p>
<p><a href="https://author.tucows.com/checkout.php" rel="nofollow">https://author.tucows.com/checkout.php</a></p>
<p>They said they will fix the problem &#8220;in the next few weeks&#8221;. It&#8217;s too late for us, however, so we will have to go with other, more expensive, alternatives.</p>
<p>Security should not be taken lightly. After all, this is the main reason for code-signing our software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why I won&#8217;t be bothering with the Windows 7 logo program &#171; Successful Software</title>
		<link>http://successfulsoftware.net/2008/02/27/the-great-digital-certificate-ripoff/#comment-13245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why I won&#8217;t be bothering with the Windows 7 logo program &#171; Successful Software]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://successfulsoftware.wordpress.com/?p=296#comment-13245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of all I would have to buy another overpriced Verisign certificate to authenticate myself to Microsoft winqual, even though I already have a perfectly valid [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of all I would have to buy another overpriced Verisign certificate to authenticate myself to Microsoft winqual, even though I already have a perfectly valid [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

