Category Archives: article

Cost effective software registration with ejunkie

ejunkieMost small software vendors don’t want all the hassle of taking payments direct from customers, so they use a third party registration service. Registration services provide payment processing plus additional services, including handling of:

  • licence key emails
  • coupon codes
  • affiliate payments
  • taxes
  • invoice sales

But these services don’t come cheap. According to this calculator some registration services charge as much as 15% commission on every £20/$40 sale. 15%! I find that quite staggering. 10% is more typical, but personally I don’t intend to give 10+% of my hard earned income to anyone, except my wife and the government. To add insult to injury some of these services also try to upsell questionable ‘offers’ to your customers. For example KAGI upsell a licence look-up service for which the software vendor gets a, frankly insulting, $1. I understand from reading the macsb forum that the upsell will be added automatically to the shopping carts of all software vendors selling downloads and will be checked by default. You then have to opt out if you don’t want it. Personally I think every software vendor should offer licence retrieval for free. And don’t even get me started on Digital River/SWREG and their Reservation Rewards ‘offer’.

PayPal and GoogleCheckout are much cheaper, with rates of approximately 3.4%[1] and 2.25%[2] respectively on a £20/$40 sale. But PayPal and GoogleCheckout are just payment processors and don’t provide all the additional services most software vendors need. They provide extensive APIs so you can ‘roll your own’ service, but this sounds like a lot of work reinventing the same old wheels.

Alternatively you can use a third party to provide additional services on top of PayPal and/or GoogleCheckout. I use ejunkie which provides most of the services you would expect from a fully-fledged registration service from just $5 per month[3]. The savings can be considerable, for example (all figures approximate):

number of $40 licences sold per year

yearly costs
10% commission registration service PayPal +e-junkie[4] GoogleCheckout +e-junkie[5]
1,000 $4,000 $1,420 $1,060
5,000 $20,000 $6,820 $5,060
10,000 $40,000 $13,660 $10,060

If you can offset your GoogleCheckout processing fees against your Google adwords spend your monthly costs could be as little as just the $5 ejunkie fee.

On the whole I have been very happy with the service I have received from e-junkie, once I got it all working. It has been very reliable and the support has been very responsive. ejunkie does seem to be more geared to selling downloads (e.g. e-books and MP3s) than licence keys and the documentation is thin in places. Consequently I had a few issues trying to bend it to my particular requirements. I will try to find time to cover these issues in another article.

You can find out more about ejunkie and try their 1 week free trial here.

Other possible third party integration solutions are PayLoadz and Linklok. For those of you who prefer a more traditional registration services, I have heard some good reports about Plimus and Avangate on various forums. Neither of these companies has been bought out by SWREG owner Digital River (yet). I haven’t used any of these services myself.

It remains to be seen whether pressure from PayPal and Google forces registration companies to reduce their fees, add more services or just puts them out of business.

Thanks to Patrick for first alerting me to ejunkie.

Full disclosure: The above ejunkie links are affiliates links. If you follow these links and sign up with ejunkie I will get a commission. It is not a lot, but I won’t need many people to sign up to cover my ejunkie fees completely.

[1] PayPal rates vary according to volume. Currency conversions cost an extra 2.5%.

[2] Google have sweetened the deal by offsetting processing fees against adwords fees until the end of 2007. This means the rate is effectively 0% if you have a moderate spend on Google adwords each month.

[3] The monthly fee depends on number of products. $5 per month covers 10 products and 50MB of storage.

[4] Based on 3.4% PayPal fee + $5 per month ejunkie fee.

[5] Based on 2.25% GoogleCheckout fee + $5 per month ejunkie fee.

Software piracy

barrier_reef_2.jpg‘Software piracy’ is a colourful term for people using your software without paying the appropriate fee for all your hard work. It includes using cracks (versions with the security removed), keygens (software that can generate valid licence keys) and sharing licence keys in contravention of the licencing terms. Parrots, eye patches and attacking ships rarely feature prominently.

You might think that software piracy is only an issue for the Microsoft’s and Adobe’s of this world. But it is a real issue for all sizes of software vendor, even for small companies selling niche products such as mine. If you don’t believe me check the logs for the crack ‘honey-pot’ page I created[1] (IP addresses obscured to protect the guilty), click the image to enlarge:

piracy_logs.gif

That’s only the people who clicked through on to my honey-pot page. It really isn’t very inviting when displayed in a search engine, so I am sure that there are many more that searched for a crack but didn’t click through.

piracy_search2.gif

A quick look at this small sample of traffic shows that people looking for cracks come from all over the world, not just poorer countries. It also shows that Mac users look for cracks just the same as Windows users. In fact Mac users are a larger proportion of visitors to this page than you would expect from market share alone. I’m not saying that Mac users are less honest than Windows users, just that you shouldn’t be complacent about piracy just because you write software for the Mac.

I know from cookie tracking that some of the people who look for cracks go on to buy a licence (yes, I know who you are). Ergo, if there is a crack for the latest version out there it would definitely be costing me sales. So what can a vendor do to minimise sales lost to piracy? The first step is to understand the motivations of the people involved.

People crack software for many reasons. Some undoubtedly do it for commercial profit, e.g. so they can illegally sell the cracked version. But I understand the main reason is the challenge of cracking the software and resulting kudos from the cracking ‘community’. Some of the crackers are skilled and use sophisticated tools that emulate the computer environment, allowing them to quickly find and remove your security code. Although there is quite a lot you can do to make a crackers job more difficult, this is just going to make cracking your software more of a challenge and therefore more desirable to some. It is highly unlikely that the best security is going to defeat a skilled cracker for long. If Microsoft and Adobe can’t write uncrackable applications, what chance have we got? Trying to defeat piracy from the supply side is a fools errand. Just make sure your security is good enough to foil an unskilled cracker – if your average customer can bypass your security you are really in trouble.

On the demand side people use cracked software simply because they don’t want to pay for it. But they can end up paying in other ways. If we look at the costs and benefits in the wider sense:

costs of legitimate purchase:

  • purchase price
  • time taken to purchase

benefits of legitimate purchase:

  • use of current version
  • free upgrades

costs of pirate version:

  • time taken to locate crack
  • risk of malware in crack
  • risk of prosecution
  • guilty conscience?

benefits of pirate purchase:

  • use of current version

If your software is successful it will almost certainly be cracked at some point. Perhaps repeatedly. Congratulations! Somebody thought your software was worth cracking. We can’t stop cracks appearing. The best we can do is to make sure the benefits minus costs is greater for a legitimate purchase than a pirate version. Ways in which we can tip this equation in our favour are:

  • having cracks removed – Demand that ISPs remove cracks as soon as they appear (likely to be a lot more successful if the ISP is in Europe or North America). To find out when cracks appear you need to check your web logs regularly for unusual activity. For example a sudden flurry of downloads from countries that don’t normally buy your software could signal that a crack has appeared. You can also set up a Google alert for ‘<app name> crack’.
  • make existing cracks hard to find – Register your software with lots of download sites. Many of them search engine optimise their pages for phrases such as ‘crack or ‘keygen’ making real cracks hard to find.
  • price appropriately – Price your software at a level people will consider fair. Perhaps offer a ‘lite’ version at a lower cost.
  • make your software easy to purchase – The slicker and simpler the purchase process the less temptation to stray.
  • display the user name – Deter casual key swapping by displaying the licencee name prominently, for example in the splash screen and status bar.
  • use a digital certificate – A digital certificate reassures users that your installer hasn’t been tampered with and is free from malware.
  • release regularly – Crackers generally don’t want to pay for the bandwidth of lots of people downloading your software. so they will usually post patches and direct people to download the original software from your site. The patch is useless as soon as you release a new version and remove the old version. Making new and improved releases available to legitimate users also makes buying a licence more attractive.
  • create a honey-pot page – Make the case for buying your software and try to win over potential pirates. Point out the dangers of using cracks and emphasize that it isn’t a victimless crime.

Whatever we do there is a certain number of people who are never going to pay for our software due to some combination of lack of means (e.g. people in developing countries) and lack of scruples. There is not much point worrying about these people. In fact we could look on them from a ‘glass half-full’ perspective as potential free marketing – even though they are never going to pay for a licence they might recommend the software to someone else who will.

We also need to do our own little bit to educate people that software piracy isn’t a victimless crime. That means doing our best to ensure that our family, friends and work colleagues don’t use pirated software. It also goes without saying that we shouldn’t use pirated software ourselves – that would be the height of hypocrisy.

What we mustn’t do is make life difficult for our paying customers. Complex, intrusive and restrictive security schemes may have a negative impact on piracy, but they will probably have a much larger negative impact on our honest customers. If you are going to use ‘phone home’ or hardware based licensing you had better be absolutely sure there is no chance of false positives. It is hard to think of a better way to annoy an honest customer than to disable the software they paid for and brand them a thief. That would be enough to make anyone turn to crime. Shiver me timbers!

[1] I got the idea of a honey-pot page from another site. Unfortunately I can’t remember the name of the site to give them the appropriate credit.

The importance of targeted website traffic

Anyone who has a website can’t help but care how many people visit it. It’s great for our vanity to know that someone else is seeing our creation. Also, if you are running a business, more hits equals more sales doesn’t it? Well, not necessarily.

Take as many hits as you like and multiply it by a 0% chance of purchasing and you still end up with no sales. What matters is not just the number of visitors, but also the quality. Visitors that have a high likelihood of buying your software are said to be ‘targeted’. What you need is targeted traffic (preferably lots of it).

Targeted traffic is particularly important when you are paying per visitor e.g. using pay per click schemes such as Google Adwords. If you are paying $0.40 per click and your software retails at $40 you need more than a 1% conversion rate or you will just be donating to Larry and Sergey’s 767 fund.

I can illustrate the importance of targeted traffic with three examples from my own table plan software website.

1. Earlier this year I agreed for PerfectTablePlan[1] to be used as part of the demonstration of D-Wave’s prototype quantum computer in return for some free publicity. The controversial demonstration got huge publicity in the IT and high-tech communities. Sadly PerfectTablePlan didn’t get a mention in the press release as I was expecting, but it did get a mention in the D-Wave founder’s blog.

  • Click throughs from D-Wave founder’s blog: 566
  • Sales: 0
  • Conversion rate: 0%

2. I hang out on the JoelOnSoftware Business of Software forum quite a bit (especially when there are boring jobs I should really be doing). People often click through to the PerfectTablePlan website from my signature.

  • Click throughs from Business of Software forum: 4,757
  • Sales: 1
  • Conversion rate: 0.02%

3. PerfectTablePlan is built using the Qt framework by Trolltech and gets a mention on their cool apps page.

  • Click throughs from Trolltech coolapps page: 1,922
  • Sales: 2
  • Conversion rate: 0.1%

The data above is based on web stats and using cookies to track the initial referrer of sales. I don’t pretend it is hugely accurate, for example it doesn’t take account of someone clicking through to my site and then emailing the URL to a friend who then buys the software. But it is accurate enough for current purposes.

Adding all 3 examples together the conversion rate averages 0.04%, or about £0.01 revenue per click. So I would have lost a lot of money if I was paying for these clicks through Adwords. What these 3 examples have in common is that they were untargeted. The people clicking through to my site were primarily interested in quantum computing, selling software or creating cross-platform software, not creating table plans.

From better targetted traffic (e.g. people searching for “table plans” on Google) I do much better, with a conversion rate typically in the range 1% to 10%, depending on how well targeted it is. That is 25 to 250 times better than the less targeted traffic.

So, next time you are boasting about the number of hits on your site (or bemoaning the lack) remember that hit counts is a flawed metric. Like LOC (lines of code) it is easy to measure, but not terribly meaningful. You need quality as well as quantity.

[1] Actually an adapted version interfacing with their D-Wave quantum solver, rather than using PerfectTablePlan’s own genetic algorithm.

Promoting your software (part 6)

21. Viral marketing

Viral marketing is where you use the software to promote itself. For example an anti-virus product could append to each outgoing email “this email scanned for viruses by <product URL>”.

Paying customers might get annoyed at the free promotion, so you should give them the option to disable viral marketing elements. You probably don’t have to worry about this for customers using a free trial or ‘lite’ version.

Pros: Free. Requires little or no effort once set up.

Cons: Not all applications lend themselves well to this.

Data point: If you email a table plan from within PerfectTablePlan it appends a URL for downloading the free trial so you can view the plan. I have no idea whether this has resulted in any extra sales.

22. Cover CDs

Many computer magazines come with a CD or DVD full of software attached. These seem less and less relevant with the increasing availability of broadband connections.

Pros: Could be useful if your trial download is very large.

Cons: I am guessing that the conversion rate is very low, especially when there are lots of other products competing for attention on the same CD.

Data point: I haven’t tried this myself.

23. Online directories

A listing in an online directory, such as dmoz.org or Yahoo, can increase the visibility of your product. There are also specialist directories for different markets. Directories used to be considered important, but they seem to be becoming less important as search engines improve.

Pros: A directory listing can bring you additional traffic directly (from clickthroughs) and indirectly (by improving your search engine page rank).

Cons: dmoz is free, but who gets in depends on the whims of the editor in charge of that section. Yahoo costs $299 dollars and doesn’t guarantee that you will get included (maintaining the entry costs a further $299 per year).

Data point: I have applied to be added to dmoz.org every 6 months or so for 2 years, but to no avail. I’m not convinced that a Yahoo entry is worth the cost. A listing I paid for in a business entertainment directory was a total waste of money (and time, due to the incompetance of their accounts department).

24. Word of mouth

If your product is good customers will often recommend it to other people, face-to-face, by email and on forums.

Pros: A happy customer is the best possible form of promotion.

Cons: You need to get everything right (website, installer, software, documentation, support etc) and that isn’t easy.

Data point: Customers email me to tell me that they have recommended my table planning software to others and I see quite a few favourable comments in forums.

—

You need to try different forms of promotion to find out which ones work best for your product. But in general you should prefer forms of promotion that keep working day after day with a minimum of effort and where you can easily measure the results.

Which forms of promotion are most effective in terms of time and cost vs sales will obviously depend on your market and budget. If your ticket price is $100,000 then expensive print ads in are more likely to be effective than if your ticket price is $30.

Obviously I haven’t listed every possible method of promotion. Perhaps the one I haven’t listed is the one that will work best for your product. Feel free to comment if you think I have missed any important ones or if your experiences are different from mine.

Promoting your software (part 5)

17. Retail

If you sell your software through a retailer (i.e. shops) the retailer will be doing the promotion for you. But big chains don’t want to talk to hundreds of software companies, so you will almost certainly have to go through a distributor such as Avanquest.

Distributors and retailers will take a very big bite out of the cherry before it gets to you. I once approached a publisher of prints and posters about selling some of my photographs. They told me that a photographer typically gets 2.5% of the retail price of a print. 2.5%! I don’t know how software retail royalties compare, but I get the impression that they aren’t vastly better. Maybe that is fair given the huge overheads of bricks and mortar shops, but its pretty dismal compared to what you get when you sell direct to the customer on the Internet. Be very wary of providing support at these sorts of margins.

But it gets worse. I have heard that a retailer can order thousands of units, not display them and then return them once the software is obsolete (e.g. a new version has been released). You have to pay to have the CD printed, pay to transport them and then pay to have them destroyed – and you never get a penny. Even when you do get paid, many of the big chains are notoriously late payers. A good distributor might shield you from some of this, but the more I find out about selling retail the worse it sounds. Obviously some products do very well in retail (e.g. popular games), but it is a very different world to selling direct, for example the packaging suddenly becomes a lot more important.

Pros: Retailers can shift huge volumes of popular titles.

Cons: Royalties per unit are pretty meagre. The retailer and distributor seem to hold all the cards.

Data point: I tried to interest a few big department store chains in selling PerfectTablePlan. One of them showed some interest but they wanted me to pay for shelf space and give them the lion’s share of the profits. I reckoned I would have been losing money on every copy they sold.

18. One day discounts promotions

A number of sites have appeared that offer a different software product each day at a deeply discounted price, for example www.bitsdujour.com . The site takes a percentage of these sales.

Pros: Some of the discount sites have quite a large following so you can potentially get a lot of exposure and quite a few additional sales.

Cons: Risks annoying customers who have just bought your software at the full price if they find out about the promotion. Could devalue your product in the eyes of some people.

Data point: I haven’t tried this approach (yet).

19. ebay

Vast amounts of buying and selling takes place on ebay, including software.

Pros: Vast numbers of potential buyers.

Cons: Ebayers want stuff cheap, very cheap. Selling on ‘fleabay’ might not be great for the image of your product.

Data point: I ran a couple of ads for PerfectTablePlan on ebay.co.uk as ‘buy nows’ at my standard price of £19.95. I thought I might get some clickthroughs to www.perfecttableplan.com even if I didn’t sell any through ebay. I got no sales and very few clickthroughs. I might have got better results by selling at less than the main website, but that would have undermined my standard price.

I have seen posts on forums by someone saying that ebay was the most effective sales channel for their low priced speed-reading software. Interestingly they said that fairly cheesy ads (I am paraphrasing from memory!) worked better for them than slicker ones.

20. Cross-selling/bundling

Cross-selling is where you offer your product, usually at a discount, to someone who has just bought a similar product. Bundling is where you offer 2 or more complimentary products together, usually at a discount from buying them individually. For example, if you buy Macro Scheduler at the moment you can get 25% off a copy off DirectAccess. As these are two different types of productivity tools it seems like a good match.

Pros: The other product is doing all the promotion for you. You have to buy something else to get the discount so it is less likely to devalue your product in the customer’s eyes.

Cons: It might not be easy to find a product that will be of interest to the same market, but doesn’t compete with your own.

Data point: It isn’t something I have tried yet. But if you have software (or a service) in the wedding or event market that you feel is complimentary to my seating arrangement software, feel free to email me.

Part 6 >>

Promoting your software (part 4)

13. Blogging

Blogging can be an effective way to let the world know about your software. Certainly it has been very effective for über bloggers such as Joel Spolsky of FogBugz. But it only makes sense if you can write (and keep writing) posts of interest to the sort of people who might buy your software – Joel writes very well on software development and his customers are software developers.

Pros: Free. Can be very effective if you are a talented writer.

Cons: Requires a lot of time and dedication. Blog posts tend to have a fairly short useful lifetime. Not all software products lend themselves to blogging.

Data point: There is only so much you can say about seating plans and I have already endeavoured to say it on my seating plan hints page.

14. Bloggers

Other people blogging about your software can also give you useful exposure. The ‘blogosphere’ tends to be fairly incestuous, so its easier to get written about if you have your own blog. But you can just approach bloggers who are influential in your market and ask them if they would like to review your software.

There are some services around that allow you to pay bloggers for writing reviews. Personally I wouldn’t trust any review if I knew it was paid for and I would consider it immoral to review a product without declaring any inducements received – so I am not going to dignify them with a link. Some attempts to bribe influential bloggers have misfired badly.

Pros: It doesn’t cost you anything to offer a blogger a complimentary licence (except a CD+postage perhaps).

Cons: Rather hit and miss, with no control over the end results. Blog posts tend to have a fairly short useful lifetime.

Data point: I have sent a few complimentary review copies of my software to people who blog about weddings and events and it has resulted in a small, but useful, amount of additional exposure.

My software was mentioned on a Danish blog in 2005 (I didn’t approach them). I still get an occasional sale from people clicking on the link in this post. I can’t read Danish so have no idea what the post says, but I assume that it is complimentary.

15. Affiliates

Affiliates are sites that send traffic to you and take a percentage of any resulting sales. You need to set up your payment processing so you can track affiliate commission. Many of the payment processing companies can do this for you, there are also third parties such as www.shareasale.com.

From discussion on various forums it seems that very few products do well enough at affiliate sales to justify the effort involved. If you do decide to have an affiliate program make it as automated as possible.

Pros: You only pay for visitors that purchase your software.

Cons: An affiliate program can be a lot of hassle to set-up and administer for little (if any) return. Less scrupulous affiliates might make inaccurate claims about your software or send out spam promoting your product. You may also end up bidding against your own affiliates on Google Adwords.

Data point: I have dabbled with affiliates The majority of affiliates have never sold a single copy. Those that have still haven’t made enough sales to justify the effort involved.

16. Resellers

Resellers buy from you (usually at a discount) and then resell to their customers (usually at recommended retail price). Resellers will generally only be interested in software that is high price or high volume or can be sold with other services (e.g. consulting).

NB/ Under UK law you can’t tell a reseller what price to sell your product at – this is considered ‘price fixing’.

If you sell through resellers, make sure you have a solid agreement that defines who provides support and who gets any upgrade fees. Be extremely wary of any sort of exclusivity – if things don’t work out you could be left high and dry.

Some large companies will only buy software through approved resellers.

Pros: Good resellers can sell large volumes of software, give you good feedback, take some of the support burden and get you into markets that might be difficult to reach otherwise, e.g. foreign language markets.

Cons: For every good reseller you may encounter quite a few time-wasters. Unfortunately it isn’t always easy to tell which is which early on.

Data point: I have a few resellers that have sold useful amounts of licences. I have also spent quite a lot of time talking about resale deals that never amounted to anything.

Part 5 >>

Promoting your software (part 3)

9. Print ads

Despite the explosion in the importance of online media, people still prefer to read dead trees. A few points to bear in mind:

  • Never pay what is says on their rate card, try to get at least 25% off. You may also be able to negotiate some editorial (and you thought it was all written by the staff – pah!).
  • The more ads you book, the better the rate you get.
  • As soon as you advertise in one magazine, all their competitors will ring you up and try to sell you advertising.
  • You can try to track the success or otherwise by using different urls, ‘where did you find out about us’ surveys or coupon codes. None of these are very reliable as customers will:
    • type the product name in Google instead of typing the URL
    • not answer the survey or forget where they heard about you
    • forget to use the coupon

‘Advertising executives’ will tell you that someone has to see your ad 7 times before they buy your product. How very convenient for their commissions! No-one has ever been able to give me a reference to support this widely cited ‘fact’. If you have a reference, please put it in a comment at the end of the blog.

Pros: Can give a lot of exposure and some credibility. Can be reasonably targeted with a good choice of magazine.

Cons: Very expensive. Difficult to measure the effectiveness. It is easier to click on a link in a web ad than to put your magazine down, start the computer and type the URL into a web browser.

Data point: I have spent several thousand pounds advertising PerfectTablePlan in UK and US wedding and event magazines. I ran everything from small classified ads in big circulation wedding glossies to quarter page ads in lower circulation event planning magazines. I used different URLs for each ad and ‘where did you hear about us’ surveys to try to measure the results. As far as I can tell the results ranged from disappointing to dismal.

A magazine for gay women recently contacted me to ask if I wanted to run an ad in their pull-out section on ‘civil partnerships’ (the new legal partnership for gay people in the UK). I kept saying no until they offered me a quarter page ad, editorial and space to announce a competition for £60+VAT. How could I lose money on that? In the competition I offered free licences to the first 10 people to email in with the magazine name and claim them. Number of clickthroughs to site: negligible. Number of sales through published ad URL: 0. Number of emails claiming one of the 10 free copies: 0!

I think it is very tough to make print ads pay when your software is a niche app selling at only £20/$35. The economics may be very different if your software sells in huge volumes (e.g. best selling games) or has a much higher ticket price. I have also found the accounts departments of magazines to be a huge pain in the backside to deal with.

10. Forums

This is a form of guerrilla marketing where you hang out in forums that your potential customers frequent and answer relevant questions with a subtle plug for your product. Exactly what is considered acceptable varies from forum to forum. Having your product URL in your signature is usually OK. Pointing people at a relevant answer on your site may also be acceptable. Starting a thread telling everyone how great your software is is unlikely to be welcome anywhere. Using fake personas to plug your own product (sock puppet marketing) is dishonest and likely to be seen straight through by forum regulars – don’t do it.

Pros: Free. Can be very targeted and can give you a lot of useful background information about your market.

Cons: Time consuming.

Data point: I know far more about wedding receptions than any man should.

11. Free ‘lite’ versions

You can give away a free, reduced-functionality version of your software as an enticement to buy the full version.

Pros: Free advertising for your product every time someone uses the lite version.

Cons: If the lite version is useful, people won’t need to buy the full version. If the lite version isn’t very useful, people won’t want to buy the full version. Catch-22. Its a fine balancing act. Also a lite version can undermine the perceived value of the full version.

Data point: This form of promotion doesn’t appeal to me. I have a ‘crippled’ functionality trial, but that isn’t the same thing.

12. Cold calling

Cold calling is phoning people without their consent to try and sell to them. Usually done by people with written scripts and rhinoceros thick skins.

Pros: I guess there must be some or people wouldn’t do it.

Cons: Time consuming (if you are doing it yourself) or expensive (if you are paying someone to do it). In the UK you can be heavily fined for calling people who have registered with the the Telephone Preference Service.

Data point: I did a bit of cold calling of event businesses in the early days of PerfectTablePlan. I hated it and quickly decided it wasn’t worth the cost to my self-esteem. I never sold a single licence this way.

Part 4 >>

Promoting your software (part 2)

5. Press releases

A press release is where you announce something newsworthy related to your product in the hope that it will be mentioned in the media (online or print). Be warned that anything along the lines of “XYZ corporation is proud to announce version 1.23 of Widgetware” is not interesting to anyone apart from you, and will be filed straight in the bin. You need to come up with something interesting, original and/or newsworthy.

You can hire a PR company to do this for you, but these people are expensive and often have the cheek to expect a monthly retainer. But all they are going to do is call up or write to magazine editors, which you could do yourself. Furthermore they know nothing about your product and probably very little about your market. I have been deeply underwhelmed with some of the press releases I have seen written by professional PR people. A PR company working for a reseller of PerfectTablePlan even managed to get a valid licence key printed in a wedding magazine! The sooner we send all the PR people off on a B-Ark to Golgafrincham the better.

Don’t expect magazines to tell you they gave you a mention. They probably won’t.

Pros: Very cheap, if you are doing it yourself. Readers pay a lot more attention to reviews and editorials than they do to ads.

Cons: Quite hit and miss and it can be hard to come up with something newsworthy.

Data point: I have done 2 press releases through prweb.com (here and here). According to prweb stats these online releases have been accessed 110,000 and 70,000 times and were syndicated by quite a few news sites. I have no idea how accurate these stats are, but I have had a few sales from links on these press release pages.

I accompanied the online press releases with sending out CDs and press kits to relevant magazines and managed to get some mentions in event magazines and even a glowing review in PC Pro magazine. But it appears that nothing gets a free mention in wedding magazines – it’s a cutthroat business!

6. Trade shows

Even the most obscure markets appear to have tradeshows. Its hardly surprising when you get to charge exhibitors $1000+ per day for a few square metres of carpet and a trestle table. If there isn’t a tradeshow relevant to your market you had better start worrying if there really is a market.

Pros: A good chance to talk to a lot of prospective customers face-to-face and see what the competition is doing. Useful for establishing credibility.

Cons: Expensive and time consuming to prepare for and requires quite a bit of forward planning. If you try to hawk your wares at a tradeshow where you haven’t paid for floor space, you may get thrown out.

Data point: I have attended a few wedding and event planning shows as a punter to talk to people and find out what is happening. I didn’t feel I could justify the cost of a stall when I would have to sell over 100-200 additional licences just to break even on costs.

7. Email marketing

Only email people if they have given you permission to do so or you have got their addresses from a legitimate opted-in mailing list. Sending out unsolicited and untargeted email is spam and can get you on spam blacklists and in trouble with your ISP. It may also be illegal, depending on where you live. You will also pay for it by having demons shoving red hot pokers up your bottom for all eternity (if there is any justice).

Pros: Cheap if you don’t have to pay for the mailing list.

Cons: Conversion rates are generally very low.

Data point: I got a legitimate opt-in list of over a thousand prospective brides and sent them an email about PerfectTablePlan. As far as I can tell I didn’t make a single sale. Zip. Zero. Zilch. I did get a few rude emails back saying I had got their name wrong (the creator of the list had managed to get the name and email columns misaligned for some records).

8. Direct mail

Direct mail is sending stuff to people/businesses via the post/mail to entice them to buy your software. In other words, junk mail. There are list brokers who can sell you mailing lists and various online services that can mail out letters or post cards to prospects. I understand that a 1% conversion rate for direct mail is considered very good.

Pros: May allow you to reach people who can’t be easily reached by online means. Mailing lists are readily available for the right money.

Cons: Expensive. Kills trees. People who can’t be reached by online means probably aren’t great buyers of software.

Data point: My software is $35. To make money from direct mail I either have to get my conversion rate above 1% or my cost per recipient below $0.35. Neither seem likely, so I haven’t bothered.

Part3 >>

Promoting your software (part 1)

peacockPromotion is an essential part of successful software – hearing about something is an essential first step to trying it. Without promotion your software is the proverbial tree falling in the forest with no-one to hear it. In this series of articles I am going to talk about some of the ways you can promote your software, and the pros and cons of each. I will also discuss how effective these various methods have been for my own £20/$35 seating planner software. Obviously this is only one data point and may not be very relevant if you are selling to a completely different market.

1. Search engine
I use ‘search engine’ in the singular deliberately, because Google is pretty much the only game in town at present. Some 80% of the search engine traffic to my site (not including paid ads) is from Google.

A constant stream of targeted prospects for free is (or should be) every marketer’s dream. All you need to do is get onto that first page of Google for your key search terms. Except that everyone else is trying to do the same and nobody really knows how Google ranks pages (except Google). SEO (search engine optimisation) is a whole separate topic. For now it suffices to say:

  • Google seems to penalise new sites, so get that domain up and registered with Google ASAP
  • the key to achieving a good ranking is to provide lots of relevant content
  • ‘black hat’ techniques may get you penalised or even banned
  • don’t believe anyone who guarantees they can get you onto the first page for a fee

Pros: Can provide large amounts of highly targeted traffic for free.

Cons: There are no guarantees on where you will end up ranked or how much traffic you will get and it can take quite a while to achieve reasonable volumes of traffic. Even if you are doing very nicely that could change next time Google change their algorithm.

Data point: PerfectTablePlan ranks pretty highly for most of the key search terms, but it is a highly focused application in quite a small niche. It took the best part of a year to start getting a reasonable amount of search engine traffic.

2. Pay per click ads
Pay per click ads are the stroke of genius that have made the founders of Google rich beyond the dreams of avarice. Again Google is nearly the only game in town, with Yahoo and Microsoft struggling to get any traction.

Pros: A very flexible and fast way to get targeted traffic. You can also get an incredible amount of feedback on what customers respond to. This is marketing gold-dust and can really help you with SEO and copywriting.

Cons: Google Adwords has quite a steep learning curve and requires constant tinkering to keep profitable. If you aren’t careful you can lose a lot of money quite quickly. Google also seems to be continually increasing minimum bid values in an attempt to squeeze more money out of advertisers. Click fraud looms large.

Data point: I tried Yahoo Overture (as it was called then) but I found the user interface painful and I lost money. Consequently I dropped Overture and concentrated my efforts on Google Adwords. Google Adwords was a very significant source of revenue in my first year, but the percentage has fallen as my unpaid search results have improved. Absolute numbers of conversion have also fallen somewhat as the market and Google force up the price of clicks. I don’t know how many hours I have spent fiddling with my Google Adwords campaign. A lot.

3. Banner ads
Banner ads are the large image ads, often animated and usually placed prominently at the tops of web pages. They are generally used to promote brands, rather than selling a particular product.

Pros: If placed on popular websites they can get seen by a lot of people. More eye catching than a text ad.

Cons: When is the last time you clicked on a banner ad? You usually have to pay even if no-one clicks your ad.

Data point: The closest I have got is running some image ads through Google Adwords. they were hardly ever clicked on and when they were the conversion rate was poor.

4. Download sites
Download sites are vast catalogues of (usually low price) software. These were an important resource for people looking for software in years gone by. However their usefulness has been gradually eroded by improved search engines and the fact that even the smallest software company can now afford their own website. The big names, such as Tucows, seem to be struggling to adapt to changing market forces.

Most download sites now accept a description of your software in PAD format. This is a blessing in that it allows you to fairly easily submit your software to lots of download sites. But it is a curse in that lots of sites have appeared using PAD file content in dubious ways to sell advertising.

If you place your PAD file in the ASP PAD database it will be picked up by many download sites. There are also services such as Robosoft that can submit your software to hundreds of download sites for you.

If your software fits into one of the standard categories and appeals to the sort of people who visit download sites (e.g. young male geeks), then download sites could be an important source of targeted traffic. Otherwise don’t expect too much. You can increase your exposure on these sites with various forms of paid promotions, such as pay per download.

It should be noted that there are a lot less Mac download sites than Windows ones, but they tend to be of a much higher quality. Some Mac developers seem to use the Mac download sites as their major form of promotion.

Pros: Free (unless you opt for various upgrade options) and all those links to your site are likely to improve your search engine ranking. As download sites tend to SEO on terms such as “crack” and “keygen” they can also make it very difficult for would-be pirates to find any real cracks that are out there.

Cons: Download sites make money selling advertising, not selling your software. There are a lot of very dodgy download sites out there.

Data point: Download sites don’t work very well for me as my software doesn’t fit into any of the standard categories. Also, most of the people who buy my software have never heard of tucows.com or download.com. But I usually submit a PAD file to the ASP database when I do a release as it only takes a few minutes. I have tried the download.com pay per download promotion and the tuwcows.com pay per click promotion – the results weren’t very impressive.

Part 2 >>

Programming in flares

waves off HawaiiFashion is such a ridiculous business. Every year anorexic clothes horses strut up and down modelling ridiculous clothes no-one is ever going to wear. Hemlines go up or down. Various baubles are ‘in’ or ‘out’. Grey is the new black. We geeks are above all that. Comfortable in our jeans, bad haircuts and nerdily sloganed black t-shirts we know that #000000 != #0c0c0c . We care not a jot for fads and fashions. Or do we?

Actually, I think software development follows its own fads and fashions, just as slavishly as any Gucci-clad fashionista. Here are a few past and present software development ‘fashions’ that spring to mind:

  • 3GLs
  • 4GLs
  • methodologies (SSADM, Yourdon etc)
  • CASE tools
  • object orientation
  • UML
  • Java
  • XML
  • extreme programming/agile methods
  • Ruby on Rails

While all of these ideas contain something useful, they never turn out to be the panacea we were promised. Consequently they follow (or, I predict, will follow) an all-to-familiar boom and bust cycle:

  1. potential – The technology appears to have some promise.
  2. hype – The technology is wildly over-hyped. Massive and unrealistic increases in productivity are touted.
  3. hysteria – Lots of books and magazine articles are written. Developers worry their careers will suffer if they don’t learn the new technology, and soon.
  4. backlash – The reality falls far short of expectations and the whole worth of the technology is called into question. But actually the technology is improving as it matures.
  5. realism – Expectations settle down to more realistic levels and the best elements of the technology are absorbed into mainstream practice.

We can visualise the cycle in a simple graph:

boom_and_bust21.gif

Java is a good example of this cycle. It started its life as Oak, a language for set-top boxes. Renamed to the more catchy Java and pushed by Sun as a write-once run-anywhere language it soon passed from hype to hysteria on a wave of coffee related puns. Everything would soon be written in Java we were told in endless gushing articles. The performance issues would be sorted out in the next release. Corel were rewriting their office suite in Java. Netscape were rewriting their browser in Java. C++ was finished. Sun’s stock rose meteorically.

In fact Java apps of the time were ugly and slow and the cross-platform capabilities turned out to be problematic. Write-once run anywhere became write-once, test everywhere. Java Corel office was rapidly abandoned when the beta was found to be completely unusable (I tried it myself, it was a joke). Netscape’s attempts to produce a web browser in Java also failed. The backlash began. In actual fact Java is now not much slower than C++ for many applications. But the Java zealots cried wolf so many times in the past that few people believe them any more. Finally we are reaching a realistic understanding of the strengths and limitations of Java, but most of us lost interest in Java a long time ago and are too busy pursuing the next ‘great thing’.

What is the latest fad? Agile methods is certainly a contender. Agile methods are ‘lightweight’ methodologies, a backlash against ‘heavyweight’ methodologies, such as Rational unified Method and SSADM. If you search for “agile” in ‘Books>Computers & Internet’ on Amazon.com you get 2,964 matches. How can so much possibly be written about a ‘lightweight’ approach? A recent C/C++ conference I went included no less than 6 talks with ‘agile’ in the title (and a couple more on the related topics of ‘lean development’ and ‘scrum’). No doubt there are whole conferences about agile methods. While I don’t doubt that an agile approach contains useful ideas, I very much doubt that it is a one-size-fits-all, ‘one true way’ to develop software. But you would be forgiven for thinking that it was if you listened to some of the agile zealots (especially the ‘extreme programming’ wing of the agile church).

Boom and bust is a painful, expensive and pathological way to adopt new ideas and technologies. Why can’t we take a more measured and mature approach? Fred Brooks warned us over 30 years ago that software development is hard and it probably always will be. But the message appears still not to have sunk in. We are still looking for for that mythical silver bullet. The problem is partly caused by many developers having a lack of perspective. They are so focused on the minutiae of programming and the latest cool technologies that they just can’t see the bigger picture. Because they don’t understand the past they are condemned to repeat it (to paraphrase Santayana).

Much of the cycle is also driven by self-interest. The pundits make a very nice living selling books, consultancy and training. The journalists get something new to write about. The developers and team leads get to do ‘cool’ stuff and add some exciting new acronyms to their CVs. The vendors are happy to sell expensive new tools. Unfortunately the employers, shareholders and customers end up with late, over-budget and buggy software because the developers choose a cool new, bleeding-edge technology over something more mature and well understood. But it is too late by the time the problems become apparent.

Development environments are now vast ecosystems of languages, libraries and tools. Surely it is better to take the time to master one of these environments and understand its strengths and weaknesses, than to be continually chasing the latest fashion and never master anything. Better the devil you know than the devil you don’t. I am not against progress and I certainly don’t think we should try to use the same tool for every job. Many of the technologies I have listed above led to major steps forward, even if they didn’t live up to the initial hype. But software development should be a means to an end and we should never be so wrapped up in the technology that we lose sight of that. Professional developers should pay less attention to the latest fashions and focus more on solving problems for their customers. An experienced C programmer is almost certainly more productive than an inexperienced Ruby programmer. Wear your flares with pride.