Interview with Craig Peterson of Beyond Compare


I am a fan of file and folder comparison utility Beyond Compare from Scooter Software. It is a very polished and powerful piece of software with a big following. But I was intrigued by some of the unusual decisions they had taken: competing in a market with lots of free alternatives; going 6 years between major upgrades; re-writing from scratch; releasing a Linux version; and having an extremely generous trial policy. How had they succeeded despite ignoring much of the conventional wisdom? Craig Peterson of Scooter Software kindly agreed to answer my questions.

Can you tell me a bit about your background before working on Beyond Compare.
I started at Scooter Software straight out of college.  I did a lot of programming for fun before then, but this was my first professional job and my first introduction to Delphi.

How long have you been working on Beyond Compare and what is your role?
I’m the lead developer and I started here in late 2000, a few months before significant development on v2 started.  Most of my time is spent working on the directory comparison and the virtual filesystem layer (ftp, zips, version control), but there are very few places in the program that I haven’t worked on.  My non-development tasks include managing the build process, interfacing with our component vendors, keeping track of any interns, and tech support, when there’s difficult questions or when the dedicated staff don’t have time.

How many other people work on Beyond Compare on the business side and on the development side?
There’s one other full-time developer, one part time developer, two in tech support, two in sales, and our president, who handles everything else.

There are lots of different file comparison tools. How do you manage to run a successful business with so many competitors, many of them free?
Competing with the free tools hasn’t been as hard as I expected.  The big advantage we have here is that people are paying us for the software, so we have strong incentive to provide good tech support and to provide the features they want.  We work 8 hours a day on it, which gives us more time to develop new features than someone doing it as a hobby, and we can afford commercial libraries that someone providing a free utility can’t.

As for the commercial competitors, it’s mostly a matter of providing something that they don’t.  In our case BC’s directory comparison is much more powerful than the alternatives, and we have viewers for other file types like images, binary files, and data files.  That allowed us to keep competing even when we were lagging in other areas.

What are the main methods you use to promote Beyond Compare?
We rely almost entirely on word of mouth.  We’ve had lots of customers tell us that they brought BC with them when they switched jobs and ended up getting their companies to spring for larger licenses.  We do spend some money on Google AdWords, and we hired a company to periodically submit our site to search engines and download sites, but we’ve never run a print or banner ad. has an enviable Google page rank of 6 and ranks second for “file comparison software”. Have you spent a lot of effort on SEO?
We had a company help with SEO for a lot of the 2.x lifetime, and they’d suggest tweaks to improve things.  For v3 we took a different approach and redesigned the site to make it more accessible to potential customers.  I’m sure some of those changes helped, since we ended up adding more descriptions and using more synonyms, but it was primarily a case of asking how we could make it easier to find the information someone would want and expanding on that.  We still have a fairly wordy page title though, and I think that’s entirely for the search engines’ benefit.

Are most of your customers programmers, or does the software appeal to a wider audience?
I’d say more than 50% are programmers, but there’s definitely a wider audience.  System administrators use it for migrating servers, web developers use it instead of a traditional FTP client, and non-techs use it for backups or synching their laptops and desktops.

How long do you allow people to use the trial version?
The trial is for 30 days, but it only counts days you actually run it, so if you use it infrequently you could easily go six months or more before it times out.

I used Beyond Compare for ages before I bought a licence. I would have bought it sooner if you had been less generous with the trial. Why did you go for such a long trial period?
That goes back to competing with all the other products out there.  If someone installs two programs to evaluate, and then doesn’t have a chance to really try them out until a month later, the one that works is more likely to get the sale.  It also makes it more likely that potential customers will learn the application and start relying on it, so when it does come time to pay they’re less likely to throw out that investment and switch to another tool.

I understand Beyond Compare v3 is a complete re-write. Why did you feel a complete re-write was necessary? Was it a good business decision in hindsight?
There were two reasons why we felt a re-write was justified: (1) we had a lot of features we wanted to implement that wouldn’t work in the current framework, and (2) we over-estimated the speed that we could re-write it.

In the text compare we wanted inline editing with dynamic re-comparisons and 3-way merge, neither of which would have been easy to integrate into the v2 codebase.  The directory compare had similarly major changes, though a lot of that is internal and in preparation for other features, so it isn’t as visible.  There was also all the work we did to get a Linux release out.  It wasn’t a complete re-write though.  Anything that didn’t need significant changes, like our reporting engine, was brought over mostly as is.

I think it was a good business decision in that it allowed us to rethink and rework a lot of things without the old baggage, but it was bad in that it significantly limited what we could release in the meantime.  We ended up going 6 years between major versions and even though we were always busy adding new features, we couldn’t release them until we got back to feature parity with v2.

Beyond Compare is written is Delphi. What would you say are the advantages and disadvantages of Delphi compared to other development ‘stacks’?
I think Delphi is still the best tool for developing a native Windows application quickly.  It’s very easy to mock up interfaces and then fill them in with code.  The resulting exes don’t have any external dependencies, which makes redistributing them easy.  The VCL (UI framework) ships with source code,  and that has permeated the community, so the vast majority of third-party components also include source.

On the flip side, it still can’t produce 64-bit executables and isn’t cross platform.  It doesn’t have a garbage collector or as large of a class library as Java or C#.  The community isn’t as large either, so there’s usually only a couple of choices when you’re looking for specific components, and if that vendor stops developing it, there aren’t as many people to pick up the slack.

If you had to do it all again, starting now, would you still choose Delphi?
Probably, but I would seriously consider C# or Qt.  In our case we have a lot of experience with Delphi and we know the libraries, so starting from scratch in another language would be a significant barrier.

Beyond Compare has a very slick user interface. Did you do any usability testing?
Not as such.  Our primary usability improvements come from using our own product.  We use BC every day, for every comparison we do, so anything that sticks out tends to get squashed quickly.  We also get alpha/beta versions into customers’ hands as soon as possible, and keep iterating until they’re happy.  V2 and v3 both had private beta tests that lasted over a year and a half, and some of the features changed dramatically in response to that feedback.

Beyond Compare has a nice integration with Windows Explorer. Was that difficult to do? Were you able to do it in Delphi?
The first version of it was submitted by a user, so it wasn’t difficult at all.  It has taken a lot of refinement to get perfect though, and we were changing it all the way through to the final 3.0 release.  It is written in Delphi, though I did rewrite it in C++ in order to get a 64-bit version working.  FreePascal has since started producing 64-bit binaries, so we’re back to the single Delphi version again.

You have Windows and Linux versions. What did you use to write the Linux version?
We’re using a heavily customized version of Borland’s now-dead Kylix product, which was Delphi for Linux.  It does allow us to compile both versions from the same source code, but it’s showing its age and I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone else.  Our driving goal is to have the best Windows version we can, which means sticking with Delphi and using what’s available to produce the Linux version.  If OS X and Linux support outweighed that we would use a cross-platform option like Qt or Java, but we believe the Windows version would suffer in that case.

Do you sell many licences for Linux?
We sell enough to fund its development, so it’s a successful product.  It does introduce new challenges though, both in development and tech support, so if we were a smaller developer it probably wouldn’t be worth the overhead.

Do you think there will there ever be a web version of Beyond Compare?
I can see it as a possibility, and it would be interesting to explore, but it’s not something we’re looking into right now.  I think it would have a different audience than the current product, and would probably never be as powerful as what we can do locally.

How did you choose the price?
Our $30 standard edition is about the same price as our commercial competitors, and seems to be the standard shareware utility price.  The pro edition was priced based on our competitors, what our customers were telling us they’d pay, and what we felt the downward pressure of the freeware/opensource alternatives introduced.  We keep the price low in order to make our profits on larger quantities sold, instead of a larger margin per-unit.  We have increased our multi-user pricing considerably over the years though;  the discounts were very steep in v1 and v2, and the feedback we got was that it was just too cheap for what it provided.

I see some translator credits on the website. Is v3 available in languages other than English?
Not officially, but we have just released beta versions of a couple of languages.  The current credits are for the v2 translators, who are generally the same people working on v3 translations.

How important are resellers to your sales?
We get a lot of sales through resellers, but it’s generally from people who would buy it either way. Foreign resellers are a help to the customers though, because they allow them to order in their own language using the local currency.

Does Scooter Software have any other products besides Beyond Compare?
No, BC keeps us plenty busy.

Thank you Craig.

You can download a free trial of Beyond Compare from the Scooter Software website. I have no affiliation with Scooter Software beyond being a paying customer.

9 thoughts on “Interview with Craig Peterson of Beyond Compare

  1. Mark Stahler

    I enjoyed the interview. I agree with Sohail, it would have been interesting to see how large Scooter was when Craig started. Nice to see the small team making money off a desktop application.

  2. Craig Peterson

    I was the first full-time employee hired to work on Beyond Compare. Prior to that it was the CEO’s off-hours pet project. Scooter Software itself is around 40 years old now; originally it did payroll and accounting and at one point had 30 employees. When I started there was just the CEO and one other person, both working on payroll software for one last client. A bit after v2 was released the other employee was a hired by that client, and the CEO freed himself up to work on BC full-time, so all our income since then has been due to BC.

  3. Nick Hebb

    Good interview. I’m trying out BC now, and so far I like the usability.

    The Scooter Software website is nicely designed. Was it inspired by Fallout 3? Or is Mark Stahler’s Pip Boy avatar along with the fact that I’m a semi-recovering Fallout 3 addict tainting my world view?

  4. Mitchell Vincent

    I hadn’t heard of Beyond Compare before but I’ll likely be buying a license in a few minutes.

    One think that really turned me off and, if it hadn’t already had endorsements by fellow ASP members like Nick and Andy, might have made me go away, is the price being hidden. I had to add the pro and standard version to my “cart” before I saw a price – that 6 clicks total. At $30/$50 for the standard/pro I’d put that price on every page!

    A $30 buy is a no-brainer for me. I’d have made the decision to purchase when I came to the first page if I had seen the price there. However, 6 clicks later, I’ll still buy it ;-)

  5. Simon Shutter

    Andy and Craig,

    Great interview. Took me back a decade to when I first bought Beyond Compare and instantly told others about it.

    I find the trial offer almost too generous. It actually made me think there was a logic error in the code and whether that was symptomatic of the product itself. I’m surprised the same offer is still available today. I would think most users would like the product much more on first use than other shareware so that delaying conversion is counter-intuitive.

    I’m also curious as to whether bigger companies like Microsoft have approached Scooter Software to incorporate all or part of the code base (like WinZip ?).

    Lastly, I’m curious why the company has not changed its name to the more recognizable product name?

  6. Vasudev Ram

    Interesting interview, Andy and Craig.

    Nice to see a product written in Delphi become a success – a case of one good software product being used to create another :-)


Comments are closed.